Looking for Reason

The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. – Ronald Reagan

Does freedom of the press still mean something?


I just saw the movie “The Post” about the lead-up to and subsequent publishing of the “Pentagon Papers” by the New York Times & the Washington Post. While I found it moving and a triumph of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press, it also displayed what a difference 47 years make, in the political climate of this country.

Richard Nixon’s Justice Department sought and got a restraining order against the New York Times after its first release of a story based on those leaked documents. Almost immediately Daniel Ellsberg gave the Washington Post copies of all the documents he had obtained. The publisher and editor were both in danger of being held in contempt and possibly prosecuted under the espionage act, if they moved forward with publication of those documents, even though they were not named in the restraining order. They felt the public had a right to know, and boldly published the first round of stories based on the contents of over 4,000 pages of documents they had received. The New York Times quickly appealed the restraining order to the Supreme Court and along with lawyers from the Post, convinced the SCOTUS to rule 6/3 in favor of the First Amendment.

In the Supreme Court ruling that upheld the right’s of The New York Times and The Washington Post to publish the Pentagon Papers, Justice Black said…

“In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors.” (Emphasis mine) this quote was used in the movie; however the full paragraph went on to say…

The Government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government.” (Emphasis mine)

Now we fast forward to these past 9 years, we now have a press that is so biased to the left-wing, that the Obama Administration literally committed murder and countless other unlawful acts, with nary a peep from the press, and what they did report was designed as much to protect Obama and his administration, as it was to deceive the public. The freedoms that were so well preserved in 1971 are but a travesty today, where the covering up of corruption on the part of Democrats, and the tearing down of the sitting Republican President and his administration are job one.

Journalistic ethics are a thing of the past, any lie or innuendo that can tarnish the President is printed instantly, without the slightest effort to validate the facts of the story. When caught publishing outright lies or innuendo, any retraction is buried on the back page if it is retracted at all.

It seems to me that we are fast approaching a turning point in our history, where if we the people do not make a stand to force our government and the press itself to uphold the values this country was founded upon and report the facts of the news, and not their ideological editorials as though they were news. Our republic is in grave danger, for no country can stand if the press itself is complacent in the over through of the government from within by members of one party over another.

Advertisements

Another Shot at Blogging.


On March 17th, 2012 I created this blog as a place to share my thoughts primarily on the Obama residency, (no I didn’t for get that P). After little more than 6 months and 28 posts later I wrote what was until now my last post on October 3rd, I guess as the election approached and then passed, I had become burnt out on everything and more than just a bit disappointed at Obama’s reelection. Now here I am five and a third years latter and I find myself with a lot of thoughts about the current political climate in this country and feel that Facebook posts are not the best way to put these thoughts to paper so to speak, so I am going to dust off the old blog page and make another run at writing my thoughts here.

Stay tuned as I have one in work, that started as a Facebook Post, but will end up here instead. I will post links to this blog on my Facebook Page as I publish them.

My Impressions of the First Obama-Romney Debate


I just finished watching the first debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney and it wasn’t so much what was said, but how it was delivered. Have you ever watched someone who’d deceitful, or flat-out lying? They avoid eye contact except for the occasional glance. By contrast have you ever watched someone who is honest, forthright and confident? They have the opposite behavior, they maintain eye contact, they speak to you not the floor or some other point in the room.

If you recorded the debate, or get a chance to see a reply and didn’t pick this up for yourself, fast forward through and watch Obama and Romney as both speak, and listen to their opponent. Obama looked at his podium or at the moderator perhaps ninety or more percent of the time, while Romney rarely looked away from his opponent. He displayed a keen focus on what Obama was saying, only looking away to take the occasional note, and spoke directly to Obama while giving his statements. The only real exception was his closing remarks when he looked into the camera as though talking to the voters.

This body language, and believe me I’m typically oblivious of this as a rule, was screaming to me that he was being 100% honest and engaged, while Obama showed his annoyance with what Romney had to say and chose to talk to Jim Lehrer for most of his answers, only glancing toward Romney with the occasional jab. I felt Romney was straight forward with his ideas on how to turn the country around, while Obama seemed to just skirt the fact that he has accomplished virtually nothing in the past four years and was begging for a “Mulligan”. (Golf slang for a do over)

Look, I don’t agree with everything that Romney proposes, but I am convinced that four more years of Obama’s policies will devastate this country. Romney expresses his desire to adhere to the declaration of Independence, ans well as the Constitution. Not the least of which was his reference to the 10th amendment which states basically that it is the states and the people who are the foremost governing powers, not the Federal government, which has far over reached its power and authority. The voters need to ask themselves… “Has Obama done the things he promised four years ago?” Things like calling George Bush’s four trillion-dollar rise of the deficit “Unpatriotic” then increasing it another six trillion in half the time? Or cutting unemployment then letting it sit stagnant at over 8% for the past 43 straight months. Those numbers are actually artificially low, as it doesn’t count those who haven’t looked for a job for the past three consecutive months. When those folks are counted, the number is nearly 16%. He said himself in 2009, that if he didn’t “…turn the economy around in three years, (his) would be a one term proposition”. I say, let’s hold him to his word.

I can’t say that Romney will keep every promise he makes, few politicians do, but when I see a man look his opponent in the eye, and speak with conviction, I see a man who is admirable, and a man of his word. Not a con-man who doesn’t look you in the eye, while hoping you don’t notice his deceit, or his record of failure. Someone who hopes you’ll just keep the Status Quo, but I don’t believe we can even hope for it to be that good if he were to win four more years. Hold him to his word, make his a one term proposition.

Who won? I give it to Romney for his engagement, his appearance of confidence and honesty, and a forthright explanation of where the present administration is missing the mark, and what he wants to do to turn that around.  Romney 1 – Obama 0

Look out Charlotte, The Democrats Are coming.


I’m waiting with almost breathless anticipation for the Democratic Convention this week. This should be more fun than watching a hypnotist show at the county fair. We watch as all those poor people up on stage will mindlessly do whatever Obama… uhm… I mean the hypnotist tells them to do, while we who are not under his control laugh at those poor souls who are. Up there doing dumb stuff that they wouldn’t dream of, if they were in their right mind.

A great example of how the Democrats play mind games with their minions is how the location of their convention is described in internal memos, and the news media etc. They all refer to it as “Panther Stadium”  in obvious reference to the Carolina Panthers football team. But that’s not the name of the stadium. The stadium’s name is Bank of America Stadium, so why do they avoid using it’s real name? I suspect that after Obama and many liberals openly supported the “Occupy Wall Street” movement, which blames all of our national ills on big banks, and corporations, therefore they obviously don’t want to publicize any connection to a evil big corporation. Not only a corporation that put it’s on the stadium, but all the currently annonomus corporations who are pouring millions into supporting the convention. Those donors’ names will not be released until October, I’m sure the reason is so they do not to spook the heard.

The convention should prove quite entertaining for several reasons, for instance Derek Hunter writing for Townhall.com said this in a recent article “The party of “Keep Your Laws Off My Body” will celebrate government takeover of health care. The party of “Keep Your Laws Out Of My Bedroom” will cheer government mandating contraception. The party of “We Are Our Brother’s Keeper” will re-nominate a multi-millionaire who has not sent his dirt-poor brother one penny to help with his own nephew’s medical bills. They will do all of this without any sense of irony or shame at their hypocrisy.” [Emphasis mine]

While the liberal press was almost gleeful that hurricane Isaac might hit Tampa and wipeout the convention, we must not forget those tolerant Hollywood liberals called for the death of conservatives [Here & here], it appears an almost karmic turn around that a heavy rain storm hit Charlotte, NC on Saturday and damaged a sand sculpture of Obama that had been created for the convention. The winds and rain were so strong from the right side of the sculpture, that is washed away much of that side. Well, Obama doesn’t have a right side anyway, so I find that rather apropos.

I am looking forward to watching this circus for all the combined stupidity that I have no doubt will be on full display. Believe me, if you miss it, I’ll be sure to fill you in here next week. Let all watch as I have no doubt that after so much race baiting, and negative commentary by the mainstream media at the RNC convention in Tampa, they will all be on their very best behavior in Charlotte come Thursday.

Obama’s Record on Jobs and Spending. Claims vs. facts.


Obama claim: We’ve added back more than 4.5 million private sector jobs and seen 29 straight months of job growth.  Sounds good huh? But let’s look beyond the hype, shall we?  When Obama was took office the unemployment rate was 7.8%, not his fault, but for all his promises to put the country on track the unemployment rate climbed to a high of 10% by October 2009.

Starting in May 2009 the jobless rate stayed at or above 9% for 22 consecutive months with a one month dip to 8.9% then back above 9% for an additional six months. So 28 out of 29 consecutive months of over 9% unemployment on his watch is hardly something to crow about. The “official” number which is what the BLS calls the U3 chart, finally dipped into the 8% range just last October and has remained there for the past 11 months.  What many don’t know, is that there is also a U6 chart, which lists also those unemployed who have just plain given up looking for work for at least the previous 4 weeks. This chart shows that the real unemployment rate is 15% or nearly double the officially reported U3 rate.

The fact is, that the official jobless rate had not been below 9% from the month after Obama took office until March 2011, that’s 37 months. So his hype about 29 months of job growth, while not untrue, doesn’t really tell the whole story. Between March 2010 and July 2012 (his 29 months) the official unemployment rate only dropped from 9.8% to 8.3%, a whopping 1.5% or about one half of one percent per month. In the 40 months of data since he took office, only 12 months have seen less than 9% unemployment.

While I’ll give him all of 2009 as an inherited problem from the Bush-era, the fact is that things continued to get worse in 2010. According to a PEW Charitable Trust study, in August of 2010 4.4 million people—roughly the population of Louisiana—had been out of work for a year or more; an increase of nearly 30 percent since December 2009. That’s a 30% increase in long-term unemployment in the first 9 months of his second year in office. By comparison Reagan inherited a bad job market too, worse than Obama’s since Reagan’s was at 7.5% when he took office, but peaked at 10.8% and stayed over 10% for 10 straight months, yet Reagan policies resulted in a drop of 3.6%, from 10.8% to 7.2% by his 40th month in office. So while Obama’s jobless rate peaked at 10% and had only dropped 1.8% over the same first 40 months in office. The Reagan drop of 3.6% took 20 months to accomplish, while Obama’s drop of just 1.5% took 28 months. He has presided over less than half the decline over a 30% longer period time between high and low points.

Read more: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000 and http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Economic_Mobility/LTU%20Addendum%20Final%2010_07_10.pdf

Obama claim: “Since I’ve been president, federal spending has risen at the lowest pace in nearly 60 years.”  Wow, really? Well, no. Let’s go back to the Clinton Presidency, when Bill took office federal spending was at 23.5% of GDP, when he left in 2001 it was down to only 19.5%, a decline of 4%. Although I was never a fan of President Clinton, the truth is that he and a strong Republican congress cut federal spending more than any administration in modern history.

Now even if you take the second half of TARP, which Obama requested; most of the Auto Bailout which Obama pushed; The Mortgage/Loan Medication Program; The Omnibus Spending Bill signed by Obama March 2009; The Stimulus Bill, and the S-CHIP expansion – take all of this 2009 spending and blame it all on Bush, even then spending is up by almost 24% in Obama’s first term vs. Bush’s last. Spending under Bush, especially in the second term, was huge, a democratically controlled congress, gave Bush Carte Blanche with the purse strings and he went wild like a kid in a candy store. Yet considering the fact that the federal deficit has climbed has much in Obama’s first term as it had from George Washington to Clinton’s first term, to claim he’s not a big spender is simply a lie.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/05/even_with_nuttings_math_obama_1st_term_spending_up_24_vs_bushs_last_term.html#ixzz258iLBxbJ

Why You Should Support Mitt Romney For President


I have not until recently supported Mitt Romney for President; I felt there were others who might have had a better chance of defeating Barack Obama, or make a better President, which are my primary desires in this election. In all honesty, I hadn’t done as much research on Romney, as I had for the others that I supported along the way. One by one those others have dropped out, for a myriad of reasons, some valid, some just dirty politics, until now the Republican nominee has been picked. Although I may disagree with some of the Republican parties underhanded dealings in regard to these candidates along the way, the bottom line is Romney is the candidate. If we want to overthrow the failed Obama regime, we must come together behind our best hope to do that.

I self-identify as a Conservative-Libertarian, now the Libertarian Candidate for President is a gentleman named, Gary Johnson, the former Governor of New Mexico, and his VP running mate is Jim Gray, a former Superior Court Judge in Orange County, California. These men share most of my political beliefs and would carry those values to the highest office in the land, so why am I not going to vote for them, and why will I try to convince my friends, of all political stripes to follow my lead? Well I’ll tell you and hopefully convince you to follow my advise.

My answer to that question is two-fold, first I’ve learned a valuable lesson during a couple of past elections. In 1992 I was unhappy with the administration of Gorge H.W. Bush over the previous four years, and I disliked the proposition of the lecherous Bill Clinton even less, so I threw my support to Ross Perot. Fast forward to 2008, convinced of the extreme leftist, no socialist, leanings of Barack Obama and not being thrilled with the choice of John McCain, I followed my Libertarian conscience, and voted for Bob Barr, the former Georgia Congressman and Libertarian Presidential candidate.

The problem in both cases was that liberals are rarely swayed from the Democratic party line, I used to say that Democrats would vote for Bozo the Clown if he ran on the Democratic ticket. Most conservatives, and independents on the other hand are not so mindlessly loyal to a party line. The result is that the liberal vote will rarely be split, but the conservative/independent vote will. While I don’t believe that my vote for Barr in ’08 was part of an overall national trend, my vote for Perot in ’92 certainly was. The proof is that Clinton won that election by the smallest percentage of the vote in 80 years, and the fourth lowest in history.

The moral of this story is that this election is far too important to do anything but vote for the only man who has a shot at dethroning Emperor Obama. I’ll touch more on that title in a minute, but those of us who despise the policies, abuses of power, and corrupt cabinet members these past four years, must unite in a strong front to drive the tyrant from the White House.

The second reason I want to encourage my friends and colleagues to support Mitt Romney is because of what I have learned about the man since I began to really look at the presumptive nominee when virtually all other contenders had fallen by the wayside. Ron Paul’s fall from contention was not so much a choice, but rather he was pushed off a cliff by his party, in a disgraceful act of back stabbing. While I do not condone the dirty tricks employed by the Republican leadership, and believe it could signal the end of the “Grand Old Party” just as the GOP replaced the Whig party in the 1860’s, due to the corruption and pro-slavery faction in the party. The Tea Party may gain even more supporters now, from more Republicans who are equally disgusted by the antics of a party that is rapidly losing sight of the values it was founded upon, and leadership self-interest.

However, despite my unhappiness with the party leadership, the fact remains that Obama must go! Mitt Romney is our last best hope to accomplish that goal. I understand why many are unhappy with Obama, but don’t like Romney or the Republican party either, so they are thinking of throwing their vote elsewhere. Before you do, consider this. Unlike BHO who came to power with absolutely no experience in the private sector, he never ran a business, or never held an administrative position in any city, county or state government. He was a lawyer, university lecturer (NOT a professor), and a community organizer. Finally he was a two term Senator who spent most of that time running for President. Does all that tremendous experience show in the terrific leadership and accomplishments of the last four years? (Sarcasm intended)

By contrast, Mitt Romney is a successful businessman, who created jobs, was recruited to help save the Salt Lake Winter Olympics when the organization was suffering from corruption and losing corporate sponsors, and running in the red. He stepped in, made management changes, reduced budgets, stepped up fundraising, and ultimately closed the Olympics with a $100 million profit. From there Mitt went on to run for and win election in 2002 as governor of the extremely liberal state of Massachusetts. In a state with a large Democratic majority in both houses, he was successful in turning around a bad economy, and enjoying a budget surplus the last two years of his term. To his credit, he even declined a salary as governor. He’s shown a proven track record in business and political leadership roles. Something sorely lacking in the White House these past several years.

Now, I didn’t vote for Ronald Reagan in 1980, I had heard my dad complain about him as governor of California, and knew that Carter was a miserable failure as President, so I wrote in for another former governor who wasn’t even on the ballot. A wasted vote, because I didn’t want to vote for people I wouldn’t want in office. I corrected my mistake with Reagan four years later and I still greatly admire the man. I wish we had politicians of his caliber today. One of my favorite Reagan quotes was…

Whatever else history may say about me when I’m gone, I hope it will record that I appealed to your best hopes, not your worst fears; to your confidence rather than your doubts. My dream is that you will travel the road ahead with liberty’s lamp guiding your steps and opportunity’s arm steadying your way.

Obama has done nothing but appeal to people’s worst fears, and raised doubts about our collective future, not to mention trampling on our liberty. I was wrong about Reagan in the first election, and I pray that I will be proven right about Mitt Romney for the faith I am placing in him to live up to those words from the Gipper, whether he claims to or not. Obama is running a negative campaign against Romney, not because Romney is an evil man, but rather because he has no record to run on. Romney has a record of success in business, and politics. Experience Obama didn’t have before taking office, and still doesn’t four years later. Nothing, I repeat NOTHING, Obama has done has earned him a second term.

Finally back to my earlier comment about “dethroning Emperor Obama”. I call him this for numerous reasons, first as I have written about before in this blog, was his “extrajudicial killing” of two men, both U.S. citizens, as well as the 16-year-old son of one of the men, by a drone attack in Yemen. The explanation given by the White House was the men were Al Qaeda operatives who promoted terrorist attacks against Americans. While I find the evidence compelling, as citizens of this country they had certain constitutionally protected rights, not the least of which were a trial before being executed. What possible ego could make anyone in government can place himself above the constitution and kill another citizen without trial? For anyone but this emperor, that’s called murder. While I feel this is the gravest example, there are some others.

After failing to get his way with congress on many occasions, last fall Obama said “We can’t wait.” and vowed to bypass congress and rule by executive order. Between November 1, 2011 and August 10, 2012, Obama has signed 35 executive orders and has at least two others in the planning stages now. Many of them contradict the will of congress. The founders set up a system of checks & balances for a reason, but the emperor doth protest. Thomas Jefferson said “In matters of power let no more be heard of the confidence in man but bind them down from mischief by the chains of the constitution.” Obama will have nothing of it, he has an agenda and the congress and constitution be damned!

I’m sure I do not need to go on any further as these examples alone more than show why Obama is a tyrant, who is not to be trusted with the limited power of the presidency, because he refuses to be bound by the constitutional limits of the office. George W. Bush while in his lame duck second term, made many of us who supported him for reelection disappointed with his wild spending and power plays. However, if you think GW was bad, just imagine a second term of Barack Obama unbridled. The republic will be gone and we will indeed live under an Emperor rather than a Constitutional Republic.

Please, no matter how the Obama campaign and their palace guards in the media try to scare you about Romney and Ryan, stop and think back to Obama circa 2009, when he stated that his presidency would be a “one-term proposition” if the economy did not turn around on his watch in “three years.” Well folks, are you better off today than you were three years ago? The bogus, but “Official” unemployment rate has hovered at over 8% these past three years, for blacks it’s over 11%. In 2000 the U.S. was ranked #1 in individual wealth in the world, in 2009 we were down to #7, a 5 point drop from 2008. Median household income in the U.S. declined from $51,726 in 2008 to $50,221 in 2009. 

When Obama first took office, the number of “long-term unemployed workers” in the United States was approximately 2.6 million.  Today, that number is sitting at 5.6 million. According to Reuters, nearly 24 million American workers are either unemployed or underemployed right now. Since Barack Obama entered the White House, the number of Americans on food stamps has increased from 32 million to 46 million. No wonder Newt Gingrich called Obama the “Food Stamp President”. When Obama took office, an ounce of gold was selling for about $850.  Today that ounce of gold costs more than $1700. The number of Americans that are not paying federal incomes taxes is at an all-time high. And finally, but not all-inclusive, during the Obama administration, the U.S. government has accumulated more debt than it did from the time that George Washington took office to the time that Bill Clinton took office.

Who do you want to lead us through this crisis, a man whose a proven failure, or a man whose a proven success?

I rest my case.

On The Loss of Civility in the Online World


When I began this blog my stated goal was to give a “reasoned” opinion on the topics of the day, in an effort to counter the vulgarity, bias, and ineptitude I see so much of. In my debut post I said in regard to those perceived short comings online… “I intend to take a higher road, I believe that name calling and the shrill whaling from (primarily) the left, is a sign that they don’t truly have an intelligent argument so they must try to deflect the conversation away from the point.” Perhaps I’ve been reading too much of that sort of crap lately, but I’m ashamed to say that a few of my posts have been below the standard I set for myself when I started this.

In reflecting on this realization, I began asking myself why this happened, and why civility seems to be dying online. The fact of the matter is, anonymity breeds contempt and dishonesty. Look at the comments posted under just about any YouTube video, and you will find a wide variety of profane and vulgar comments that would never be used in polite, face to face conversation. While I considered many of them to be simply sophomoric teenagers, to my chagrin, I have found that many of these posters are in their 30’s, 40’s and even 50’s.

Such things as spelling, grammar and composition are sorely lacking in many of these posted comments. When someone makes a comment that goes against the general consensus or even just another posters views, they are met with profanity, put downs and/or name-calling. Name-calling is at its core just another form of bullying, it is sophomoric and typically employed by those who lack the intellectual capability to make a point based on reason or fact. They don’t like someone or something so they belittle it in an effort to make themselves look or feel better. When these folks can’t get their way, or someone disagrees with them, they become belligerent and try to force their way on others, like a bully pushes smaller kids around. After all, they’re protected by the anonymity offered by the Internet, who’s going to hurt them back.

At first I blamed the trend solely on liberals, but I have come to realize that they do not have a corner on that market. For example a recent (currently on going) thread on YouTube has a conservative in his 50s engaged in a war of words with a liberal, who is 37 years old. The conservative uses poor grammar and even worse spelling, while spewing a seemingly endless string of names,  and put-downs. His somewhat better spoken opponent, does likewise and repeats them over and over ad nauseum. The guy needs a thicker play-book, but both men need to grow up! Had I not looked at their biographies, I would have thought these were a couple of 13-year-old kids. It reminded me of a quote by Mark Twain, “Never argue with an idiot, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience, and bystanders will not be able to tell the difference.”

I suppose there’s nothing that can be done to improve the etiquette of those engaged in online discussions, especially while they are protected by the anonymity the forum provides. As for myself, I will continue to try leading by example, refraining from using such tactics and remaining cognizant in these posts to strive to maintain that higher road. If I falter in my attempts, I would welcome a reminder in the comments section below the post that my aggravation is obviously getting the better of me.

Rob

The Left Is Going Into Full Panic Mode


With Mitt Romney’s pick of Paul Ryan as his running mate, the left is going even more insane than they already were. Prior to the announcement, we heard that Romney was a job outsourcer while at Bain Capital and that he was somehow responsible for the cancer death of a man’s wife. The fact that Romney had left Bain two years before the man lost his job and insurance, or that his wife was employed and had her own insurance makes no difference to the liars on the left. They will never let a good lie go to waste.

And let’s not forget such Left Wing luminaries as Harry Reid, who made this stupid accusation about Mitt Romney, “The word’s out that he hasn’t paid any taxes in 10 years. Let him prove that he has paid taxes—because he hasn’t.”.  Really? Guilt by slander? In our legal system you’re innocent until proven guilty; in left wing politics you’re guilty till you prove yourself innocent. Now the idea that the IRS would possibly overlook a big ticket like Romney skipping his taxes for a decade, should put big question marks in the minds of even someone with a room temperature IQ. But the leftists in the media gave Reid plenty of air play. I guess they have been out in the cold so long, that they haven’t yet reached room temperature.

If these two recent examples aren’t bad enough, looks what’s coming from the media now that Ryan is on the ticket. ABC’s Bianna Golodryga and David Kerley said respectively on Sunday… “New battle lines have been drawn after Mitt Romney chose conservative congressman and budget-slasher Paul Ryan as his running mate.” and “Sen. Harry Reid claimed that the pick of Ryan caters to the far right rather than standing with the middle class. Others called Ryan extreme. The ticket, a match made in millionaires’ heaven. Ryan, the author of disastrous budgets.”

Wow, “budget slasher” or “author of disastrous budgets.” Is the left really so stupid that they believe in a time of government over-spending that these are bad things? I should add that the Ryan budget was not passed because congress is spineless. However, ABC wasn’t done yet, on Monday David Muir said “Ryan is known in the political world for his controversial budget plan that would call for steep cuts and the Obama campaign said it would change Medicare as we know it.” Is that the same Medicare that’s already being gutted by Obamacare? The liberal duplicity is astounding. Ryan on the other hand went on the offensive on Tuesday saying that the Romney/Ryan plan will save Medicare from being gutted by Obamacare. [Read it here]

On Tuesday (Aug 14) Joe (the gaffer) Biden had this to say about Romney… “he’s gonna let the big banks once again write their own rules. Unnnn-chain Wall Street,” he exclaimed “They’re gonna put y’all back in chains,” [Watch him here] this from the administration that was going to end the racial divide. Since 2008 when Obama and Biden were elected, the racial divide in America has grown, not shrunk, and much of it is the direct result of comments like these from the administration and the left in general.

These are but a few recent examples out of many that show the left is in panic mode. In an article published today (Aug 15, 2012) Michael Medved points out The one way for the GOP to regain momentum would be to return the campaign’s focus to the issues, where most Americans agree with them. More people want to see government do less than do more and prefer to see spending cuts rather than Obama’s “new investments.” According to Gallup, those who describe themselves as “conservative” outnumber those who call themselves “liberal” by nearly 2 to 1 (40 percent to 21 percent), which suggests that the GOP should win any election that focuses on ideology, rather than on vague notions of hope and change or questions of which candidate would make the most lovable neighbor over the backyard fence.”(emphasis added) I hope he’s right and I hope Romney & Ryan do.

Why don’t liberals ever learn?


While liberals claim to be the guardians of tolerance; and are always quick to put up their battle cry of “Intolerance” when anyone speaks their mind about things with which liberals disagree. The reality is that their tolerance is only for those who agree with their point of view, for these liberal hypocrites, tolerance is a one-way street. Two recent examples are the recent hoopla over the comments of Dan Cathy, the CEO of Chick-Fil-A who committed the sin of stating his belief in the traditional, no “Biblical”, definition of marriage. Oh the liberals began screaming that this man was a hate monger and of course began a push to boycott Chick-Fil-A restaurants.

Let’s not forget that there was also a controversy stirred up over comments made by Rush Limbaugh a few months ago, when he called a female college student a whore and a slut. This was after she gave some self-serving statements to a group of congressional Democrats, gathered up by Nancy Pelosi, into a pseudo-committee hearing, with the expressed purpose of getting the young woman’s comments in the congressional record, as well as in front of the news media. This was Pelosi’s end run after a real congressional committee declined to allow the student to testify on behalf of taxpayer-funded birth control, because she was not an expert witness. Liberals, even those who had publically called Conservative women like Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman those same names with complete impunity, screamed for Limbaugh’s head.

So what do these two seemingly different events have in common? Simple, in both cases the (in)tolerant left attempted to organize boycotts. With Limbaugh, the left pressured advertisers to drop their advertising on Limbaugh’s number one rated radio program or be boycotted. With Chick-Fil-A they called for people not to patronize the fast food chain. The result in both cases was not only a complete failure to get their way, but the attempted boycotts backfired and the outcomes were the opposite of what the liberals had wanted.

In the Limbaugh case, some advertisers bowed to the pressure applied by the left, and those advertisers ultimately paid a heavy price for their actions. One example is Carbonite, an online data backup service provider, whose CEO now admits that dropping advertising on the Rush Limbaugh show hurt their bottom line much more than expected, and many other advertisers who dropped their ads have indicated similar negative results. At the same time, the number of advertisers wanting to get on the Limbaugh show actually grew as a result of the controversy, with Limbaugh turning many away, and refusing to take back those who quickly saw the error of their ways.

Now, when the leftist media twisted the words of Dan Cathy, the CEO of Chick-Fil-A, from an endorsement of traditional marriage, into a make-believe gay-bashing story, they only succeeded in putting their feet in their collective mouths. These talking heads and their mindless followers still haven’t learned that they are the minority in this country. That their ideas are not those of the majority of Americans and that this otherwise “silent” majority will drown out the screaming liberals with their money, supporting those with whom they agree, and starving out those who don’t share their values or try to coerce them.

When the media and the LGBT crowd screamed for a boycott of Chick-Fil-A, the backlash was swift and I’m sure surprising to these nit-wits who just won’t learn from history. When the media firestorm erupted, former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, started a campaign to support the beleaguered chain with a “Chick-Fil-A Appreciation day” to be held on August 1st. The result was staggering; with the chain seeing  record-breaking sales on Wednesday, including many locations actually running out of food.  Read about it here  & here.  Not surprisingly, the mainstream media has been all but silent about this incredible show of support.

What I do find surprising is that other corporations are stupid enough to get in on the wrong side of the issue. A Wendy’s franchise owner with 86 locations in North and South Carolina had a number of their stores put up “”We stand with Chick-fil-A” signs. But when word got out, Wendy’s corporate officials put pressure on the franchisee to remove the signs, and later those same officials sent an email to WBTV, in Charlotte, North Carolina saying…  

“This is one independent franchisee’s personal opinion. We are proud to serve customers of varied races, backgrounds, cultures and sexual orientation, with different beliefs and values, bearing that in mind, this franchisee has decided to remove the messages from his restaurant signs.”

What these corporate dorks fail to understand is that Chick-Fil-A is likewise proud to serve all their customers without regard to any of those stated differences. The franchisee that showed support for Chick-Fil-A is far more in step with public sentiment, and a truly inclusive mind-set, than the corporate dorks who sent that email.

SURPRISE! Democrats are now backpedaling over Keystone XL


I have lost count of the number of emails I have received from both family and acquaintances asking me to sign a petition to oppose the Keystone XL Pipeline. I responded to all of them asking why they were opposed to this. I then explained that pipelines are the safest way to transport oil, that Canada was going to sell their oil somewhere, and if we didn’t buy it, the Chinese surely would. I hate to have to say it but, I TOLD YOU SO!

Before I go on, let me clue you in on some facts, the Trans-Alaska Pipeline was built over 35 years ago, and has never suffered a spill that wasn’t the result of sabotage. In each of those cases of sabotage, the spill was rapidly contained and the oil confined to a few acres of dirt. Much easier to clean up than the same amount of oil spilled in a tanker accident in water. Furthermore the technology to build and operate such a pipeline is far more advanced now than when the Trans-Alaska was built. So what’s the problem?

Stopping Keystone XL doesn’t mean a pipeline won’t be built, but rather the pipeline will run west instead of south. Terminating in British Columbia, Canada, and the oil will be loaded onto tankers bound for China. These tankers will ply the pristine waters of the inside gateway and Strait of Juan De Fuca, between Vancouver Island and Washington State. Once more the misguided screams from the environmentalists will likely cause far more harm than they purport to prevent. How much more sensitive could a few acres of dirt in the mid-west be, over the pristine waters of the Pacific Northwest?

Well, it seems that China’s state-run oil company CNOOC, is now poised to cut a $15.1 billion deal with the Canadian oil company Nexen. The pipe will be built west and oil that would have reduced the number of tankers of Middle Eastern oil coming to the US, will not be reduced, and in fact tanker traffic near our coast line will increase. Instead of buying oil from our friend to the north, we will continue to buy oil from the mid-east where the money my well be used against us. These misguided souls who fell for the lie that blocking the XL pipeline would mean that the Canadian oil would stay underground, will have to blame themselves if or heaven forbid, when, a tanker accident happens in northwest waters.

Now with the news that China was about to cut a deal, the same brain-dead Democrats who opposed Keystone XL are backpedaling in high gear. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) is now writing letters to “ensure U.S. companies get reciprocal treatment” and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is expressing worry about “the Chinese government’s continued attempts to use its state-owned enterprises to acquire global energy resources.” Really? Where the hell were these two morons when it counted? I see this as a lame attempt by the same idiots who led the campaign to block Keystone XL in congress to try to do a little CYA, and to appear to be looking out for US interests. They will fool only their brain-dead loyalists who will refuse to see that it was these morons actions that put us here in the first place.

Read the story here.

Let’s clean house in November, vote for no incumbent, show them who’s boss!